toastyfrog.net random header image

Random Quotes

Site Menu:

Recent Posts

Site search

RSSMe on Twitter

My Photos

www.flickr.com
This is a Flickr badge showing public photos and videos from Geek2Nurse. Make your own badge here.

My Videos

About the Author

RuthI'm an engineer, artist, mom, wife, and registered nurse. I work on an inpatient psych unit and live in the Pacific NW USA with my husband and our menagerie of dog, parrots, cats, and a couple of corn snakes.

Categories

Archives

Links

Feeds & Subscriptions

Meta

Links to Site

Wandering Wombs

Picasso

I was reading in my psych text recently about how back in pre-Freudian times when women suffered from “hysteria” they decided that it was caused by a “wandering womb”. The root word of “hysteria” is from a Greek word that means “uterus”. The malady had various manifestations, including spontaneous blindness, partial or even full paralysis, inability to speak, unexplained pain in various body parts, and of course a multitude of mental illnesses.

Since they thought then that only women suffered from this malady, they naturally deduced that it must be caused by the uterus, because men don’t have them. Yep. Then, to explain why the pains and paralysis would migrate to different parts of the body, they came up with the idea that women’s uteruses would “wander” around inside of them, wreaking havoc wherever they went.

It raised some interesting questions in my mind. As well as an observation or two. For instance:

What if a pregnant woman’s womb decided to “wander”?

Did other organs and body parts also spontaneously take off on jaunts around the anatomy?

Could it be that perhaps all those 18th and 19th century artists were actually realists, and that people back then actually LOOKED like that?

The whole corset thing suddenly makes a lot of sense, too. I’d be wearing a full body corset, myself. Lock those rebellious body parts down and keep them where they belong!

Comments

Comment from Eilonwy
Time: October 4, 2004, 10:15 am

I’m surprised…

I’m surprised they didn’t make up a similar malady for male reproductive organs. Would have explained so many regrettable indiscretions with no reflection on the owner of the wandering member….

Comment from Ruth
Time: October 5, 2004, 12:18 am

Re: I’m surprised…

Ack. That’s just… SCARY!

Comment from Eilonwy
Time: October 5, 2004, 7:10 am

Re: I’m surprised…

Ack! I didn’t think of it THAT way! Must…clean…brain….

Comment from Greystork
Time: October 5, 2004, 2:10 pm

Re: I’m surprised…

Not to be intentionally distasteful, mind you, but this was pretty much the thing that sprang to my mind, so to speak. ;o)

Comment from Bedrick
Time: October 5, 2004, 5:33 pm

Re: I’m surprised…

Yeah, thanks a lot, Felicity. An very “not appropriate for work” image just popped in my head, and now refuses to leave. Gaaah!

Comment from Bedrick
Time: October 5, 2004, 5:34 pm

OK, I do in fact know basic grammar…

That should have been “A very …”, not “An very”. Stupid work, messing with my brain…

Comment from Ruth
Time: October 5, 2004, 11:14 pm

Re: I’m surprised…

And you just happened to be browsing a site called “bachelorette.com” because…?

Wait, don’t tell me! I’m pretty sure I probably don’t want to know! :-/

Comment from Greystork
Time: October 6, 2004, 4:56 pm

Re: I’m surprised…

Teehee. Actually, I didn’t just happen to browse that site. It was what came up on a Google search. Now you can ask yourself if you really want to know what I was Googling for. ;o)

Write a comment